UnderOath.ai helps firms automate repetitive work, respond to clients faster, and build more efficient operations without replacing the people or software they already trust.
UnderOath.ai helps law firms eliminate operational bottlenecks through secure AI automation, streamlined workflows, and documented systems. We identify where work piles up, build the workflows that clear it, write the SOPs, and train the team to use everything confidently.
Repetitive steps between an inquiry and a signed matter run on their own.
Every inquiry gets a real reply in minutes, on Friday afternoons included.
Documented workflows and SOPs so the firm does not depend on one person's memory.
A missed call after five becomes a client who has already retained someone else.
Engagement letters, conflict checks and file setup wait on whoever has a free hour.
Status questions arrive because nobody promised the client an update on a schedule.
Collection is a chain of reminder emails that somebody has to remember to send.
The way things are done lives in one paralegal's head, not in a written procedure.
Time entry and payment reminders happen when there is time, which is rarely.
Every inquiry is answered the same way, in minutes, whether or not someone is at the desk.
The steps between a signed engagement and the first substantive work, handled on their own.
Drafting and summarising support that works from the firm's own material, with a person on the last step.
Written procedure and hands-on training, so the systems keep working after we leave the room.
Automation that is installed and left alone stops matching how the firm works within a quarter. The AI Operations Partnership keeps the systems current: reviewed monthly, extended as the firm grows, documented as they change.
See what a partnership coversWe look at what the workflows actually did last month and where they drifted.
New automations ship as the firm grows, not as a separate engagement.
Procedures are updated when the process changes, so documentation stays true.
Staff can ask questions and get changes made without opening a ticket queue.
A standing look at what shipped and what drifted.
Law firms, exclusively. No other verticals.
Anything that leaves the firm is sent by a person.
We start with an AI Operations Audit. It is a standalone engagement — the firm keeps the map and the plan whether or not we build anything.
Start with a free auditWe interview attorneys and staff and examine how inquiries, clients, documents and internal tasks actually move through the firm.
You get a map of current workflows, the largest bottlenecks, recommended automations, security and human-review requirements, and a prioritised implementation plan with estimated time and cost savings.
Workflows go live one at a time, inside the software the firm already uses, each with a defined human checkpoint before anything reaches a client.
Written and video SOPs for every workflow, plus hands-on training so the team runs the systems without us in the room.
Regular review, new automations as the firm grows, and SOPs kept current as processes change.
Automation in a law firm is only useful if it is defensible. Every workflow we build names what it can access, what it can send, and who signs off.
Client data stays inside the systems the firm already uses. We configure access; we do not relocate matters into our own tools.
Anything that leaves the firm or touches legal judgement is drafted by the system and approved by a person before it goes out.
Every workflow ships with its review requirement documented, so the checkpoint survives staff turnover.
Inside the practice management, document and email systems the firm already runs. We build workflows on top of those systems rather than moving matters into new ones.
Only what a given workflow needs. Access is scoped per workflow and documented in the SOP, so the firm can answer the question precisely if a client asks.
Only for the narrow, pre-approved categories the firm chooses — acknowledgements and scheduling confirmations. Substantive communication is always reviewed by a person.
The workflows and the SOPs belong to the firm. Documentation is written so another provider, or the firm itself, can maintain them.
Interviews and workflow mapping, ending in a written plan: the bottlenecks, the recommended automations, the review requirements, and what each one saves.
Book a free operations audit